Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

D+D News

Main News Page


Subcontractors Under Seige at Grenfell Inquiry

Thursday, June 14, 2018

More items for Good Technical Practice

Comment | More

A year after London’s Grenfell Tower fire claimed more than 70 lives, the public inquiry hearings are just getting started, with opening statements and fact-checking commencing just last week.

Early on in the process, however, the inquiry focused on the subcontractors responsible for the tower’s recent refurbishment, most of whom have refused to give statements to the council. The cladding installed during the updating project is taking the brunt of the blame for the fierce and quick spread of the fire.

Studio E Architects, along with facade manufacturer CEP and installer Harley, did not provide opening statements, drawing harsh criticisms from lawyers representing survivors and the bereaved.

“The corporates’ silence deprives the families of the degree of resolution and understanding to which they are entitled, and has only served to increase their pain and uncertainty,” said Stephanie Barwise of the Queen’s Council.

“Despite their words of condolence to the victims, these corporates have no desire to assist this inquiry, even though their participation could save lives in the immediate future.”

The general contractor on the refurbishment, Rydon, did submit to the inquiry. In its statement, it didn’t address whether or not it agreed with allegations that the work breached regulations, and claimed that it ultimately was not responsible for the cladding choices.

The Independent reports that Arconic, the manufacturer of the aluminum composite cladding that was installed during the reno, commented and said that, at most, the panels contributed to the fire, but did not make the catastrophe “inevitable.”

The subcontractors who didn’t comment are waiting until they have full disclosure of documents, according to the inquiry.

“It is inhumane to remain silent when so many seek understanding and answers—answers which are within the corporates’ gift,” Barwise said.

   

Tagged categories: Cladding; Fatalities; Fire; Health and safety; Safety

Comment from john lienert, (6/14/2018, 6:52 AM)

'speak-up....so we can lock you up "....good luck with that approach !


Comment from Michael Halliwell, (6/14/2018, 11:19 AM)

Hehehe....at least, John, it was silence and not "We refuse to make a statement on the grounds that it might incriminate us."


Comment from Eric Murrell, (6/15/2018, 6:59 AM)

Silence is a mistake. If you're not at the table you're going to end up on the menu.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
Novatek Corporation
 
Novatek Portable Air Filtration Systems
 
Air Scrubbers/Negative Air machines for restoration, abatement, dust & odor control, hazardous contaminant removal from job sites to clean rooms and hospitals. Portable, affordable!
 

 
Shield Industries, Inc
 
FireGuard® E-84 Intumescent Coating - Shield Industries, Inc
 
Trust the certified protection of the industry’s most innovative intumescent coating FireGuard® E-84 to provide you with the 1 and 2 hour fire ratings you need.
 

 
Keim Mineral Coatings
 
Mineral Silicate Paints + Stains Fuse to Concrete
 
• Forms permanent chemical bonds
• Becomes part of the concrete
• Will never peel
• Looks completely natural
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved