Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

D+D News

Main News Page


Report: Better Cladding Originally Slated for Grenfell

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

More items for Building Envelope

Comment | More

A recent report has revealed that nonflammable aluminum panels had been proposed for the cladding of London’s Grenfell Tower—the site of a deadly fire last June that killed at least 70 people—but were shot down because of costs.

The Guardian recently obtained information about the tower’s refurbishment project when it was out for bid.

The Findings

The publication found that, at first, under the local government’s preferred contractor, Leadbitter, subcontractor D+B Facades had provided a 3.3 million-pound quote to fit a system of aluminum panels backed with mineral wool insulation.

ChiralJon, CC-SA-BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

A recent report has revealed that nonflammable aluminum panels had been proposed for London’s Grenfell Tower—the site of a deadly fire last June that killed at least 70 people—but was shot down because of costs.

A few months later, the council decided that Leadbitter wanted to spend too much on the refurbishment, and put the contract out to tender to save about 1.3 million pounds. It went with a different contractor, Rydon, which provided a lower bid, but fitted the tower with the combustible cladding that authorities believe contributed to the number of fatalities in the fire.

However, the council then needed to approve a different budget for the work, and the quote for the combustible materials ended up being 200,000 pounds more money—meaning that in the end, the council paid more for less safe materials.

“It is more news that tells us our loved ones would be alive today if different decisions had been taken and if the people in charge had put safety first,” said Sandra Ruiz, of the Grenfell United survivors’ group.

“We need the inquiry to get to the bottom of why plans for the refurbishment were changed and why when the community raised concerns they were ignored.”

The Guardian found that the council had originally wanted to spend 6 million pounds on Grenfell, but later set a different budget of 9.7 million pounds, because it realized it needed to replace the heating system. Leadbitter was on course to spend 11.3 million pounds, which is why council says it put the contract back out.

Natalie Oxford, CC-SA-BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Guardian fund that the council had originally wanted to spend 6 million pounds on Grenfell, but later set a different budget of 9.7 million pounds, because it realized it needed to replace the heating system. Leadbitter was on course to spend 11.3 million pounds, which is why council says it put the contract back out.

“Kensington and Chelsea were inviting main contractors to express interest under a ‘design and build’ contract,” Peter Hillyard, director of D+B Facades, told The Guardian. “This was the last we heard and received no further requests from Rydon, who won the contract for the work.”

A previous dive into the 2016 renovation revealed that Reynobond PE (polyethylene) panels were used in the high-rise.

Manufacturer Omnis Exteriors confirmed that they supplied the Arconic Architectural Product to Harley Facades—the subcontractor that Rydon utilized for the cladding work.

   

Tagged categories: Accidents; Cladding; Fatalities; Fire; Fireproofing; Government; Government contracts

Comment from Simon Hope, (5/16/2018, 4:09 AM)

the cladding was a major driver but the whole catalogue of fiascos in this refurb had to be in place to cause this disaster. a great example of the swiss cheese analogy. There by the grace of god go many other buildings that haven't yet lined up all the holes. A very hard way to learn that bean counters are not engineers and should be kept well away from things they have no knowledge in, all they are interested in are their bonuses for creative accounting. Accidents like this don't happen, they are made, this is premeditated and the courts need to take those responsible to task.


Comment from denis carr, (5/16/2018, 8:35 AM)

In a court of law the word accident is not permissible, there are unsafe conditions or unsafe actions.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
Shield Industries, Inc
 
FireGuard® E-84 Intumescent Coating - Shield Industries, Inc
 
Trust the certified protection of the industry’s most innovative intumescent coating FireGuard® E-84 to provide you with the 1 and 2 hour fire ratings you need.
 

 
Novatek Corporation
 
Novatek Portable Air Filtration Systems
 
Air Scrubbers/Negative Air machines for restoration, abatement, dust & odor control, hazardous contaminant removal from job sites to clean rooms and hospitals. Portable, affordable!
 

 
Keim Mineral Coatings
 
Mineral Silicate Paints + Stains Fuse to Concrete
 
• Forms permanent chemical bonds
• Becomes part of the concrete
• Will never peel
• Looks completely natural
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved