Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site


D+D News

Main News Page

Property Owner to Pay Fine, Abate Lead

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

More items for Maintenance + Renovation

Comment | More

A California real estate company has reached a settlement with federal authorities after it failed to notify tenants of the presence of lead-based paint in some of its rental properties.

Piini Realty Inc. will have to remove doors, windows and kitchen cabinets from 12 of its properties in Salinas, CA, according to an Aug. 24 statement from the Environmental Protection Agency. The abatement will need to be performed by a company qualified to do such work, and the real estate agency will have to provide progress updates.

All of the lead-based paint must be removed within 18 months, the EPA said. The federal agency also levied a $4,250 fine on the company for failing to disclose the lead-based paint to potential tenants. Also, Piini Realty must spend a minimum of $38,255 removing the paint.

©iStock.com /  westphalia

Piini Realty Inc. must pay more than $40,000 and perform an abatement project to resolve allegations it failed to noifiy tenants of the possibility of lead-based paint in its properties.

“To protect families from lead poisoning, it is crucial for property managers and landlords to provide tenants information concerning the known or potential presence of lead-based paint hazards,” said Jared Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest, in the statement.

“Lead-based paint is still the main source of lead exposure for children, which can cause learning disabilities and behavior problems,” he said.

Avoiding the Law

The federal government banned lead-based paint from housing in 1978. Federal law requires that those who sell or rent properties must disclose lead hazard information to potential buyers or tenants.

But that didn’t happen in the case of Piini, according to the EPA.

An EPA investigation found that the firm did not provide lead hazard information nor notify its future tenants of possibility that lead-based paint could exist in their homes.

The EPA says it puts a high priority on lead-based paint awareness because it is an issue that adversely affects children and lower-income families.

No level of lead paint in the blood is considered safe, according to the U.S Center for Disease Control.


Tagged categories: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Government; Lead; Lead; Lead Disclosure Rule; Lead paint abatement; Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (LRRP)

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Novatek Corporation
Novatek Portable Air Filtration Systems
Air Scrubbers/Negative Air machines for restoration, abatement, dust & odor control, hazardous contaminant removal from job sites to clean rooms and hospitals. Portable, affordable!

Keim Mineral Coatings
Mineral Silicate Paints + Stains Fuse to Concrete
• Forms permanent chemical bonds
• Becomes part of the concrete
• Will never peel
• Looks completely natural

Shield Industries, Inc
FireGuard® E-84 Intumescent Coating - Shield Industries, Inc
Trust the certified protection of the industry’s most innovative intumescent coating FireGuard® E-84 to provide you with the 1 and 2 hour fire ratings you need.


Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com

The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker


© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved