Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

DURABILITY + DESIGN BLOG

Comment |

Correlation and Intent in Contract Documents

FRIDAY, MAY 26, 2017

By Letsfixconstruction.com


More items for Good Technical Practice

Although it didn't seem like it at the time, one of the best parts of my CSI chapter's certification classes was reading the A201—not selectively, but the whole thing, beginning to end. Being the heart of the construction contract, anyone who works on a project should know what's in the A201. I can't quote every part of it, but it's familiar enough that I can find what I'm looking for fairly quickly. I don't deal with much of it, such as claims and time requirements, but there are a few parts that I find of particular interest.

We'll start with what I call “the complementary clause.”

§ 1.2 CORRELATION AND INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

§ 1.2.1 The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work by the Contractor. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is required by one shall be as binding as if required by all; performance by the Contractor shall be required only to the extent consistent with the Contract Documents and reasonably inferable from them as being necessary to produce the indicated results.

Lorenzo Cafaro via pexels.com

The complementary clause can be quite useful when something is on the drawings but didn't make it into the specifications.

Most architects are aware of this requirement, which is quite useful when something is on the drawings but didn't make it into the specifications. Clearly, when that happens there has been a communication failure. The specifier might not have seen something on the drawings, or it might have been added unbeknownst to the specifier. Regardless of the reason, this clause has saved many an architect when something was missed.

It's obviously a useful fallback requirement, but it shouldn't be relied on to cover mistakes that could have been avoided. It is quite powerful, but it is also limited. Let's look at a couple of examples.

When There Are No Specs

The bidding documents show a bathroom on the drawings, and in the bathroom, floor tile is indicated. Unfortunately, there is no specification for tile. No problem, right? The complementary clause requires the contractor to provide floor tile! Of course, there is that pesky provision that requires the contractor to ask the architect about obvious conflicts, but it's pretty much impossible to prove the contractor saw this error and failed to call the architect.

Now, we're in construction, and the contractor discovers the error. Because the tile should have been included in the bid, and because of the complementary clause, the contractor is on the hook—the tile must be provided. That is true, but without specifications, the contractor is free to choose any type of tile. The contractor can claim the bid was based on plastic tile on sale at the discount store, instead of the really cool stuff the architect wanted, priced at $20 per square foot. Furthermore, without installation instructions, the contractor could argue that simply laying the tile on the floor is all that's required.

A silly example, to be sure, yet it emphasizes the importance of specifications as a way to ensure you get what you want.

When There Are No Drawings

Perhaps less common is having specifications for something that does not appear on the drawings, but it does happen. Let's use fire extinguisher cabinets for this example. The specifier knows the project has them, and includes the specification section. As long as the locations are on the drawings, it doesn't matter to the specifier if there is but one, or if a hundred will be required.

This time, when the "missing" fire extinguisher cabinets are discovered, the contractor says, "The locations weren't shown, so I assumed only one was needed." The specifications are there, so the correct unit is provided, but instead of a hundred, the contractor included only one.

Just Be Reasonable?

Another aspect of the complementary clause isn't so obvious. Note that the contractor is required to provide "all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work." This applies not only to tile and fire extinguisher cabinets, but to all the stuff used to hold everything together. It may be possible to specify absolutely everything used in a building, but given the number of products used, it's likely that some things are not specifically addressed. Instead, they are considered to be components of an assembly that are indirectly specified by way of reference standards or manufacturers' instructions.

AIA's position on this is stated in the "AIA Document Commentary" for the A201: "The contractor is expected to make reasonable inferences from the contract documents. When the documents show wall partitions covered by drywall, for example, it may be inferred that some reasonable method will be used to attach the drywall to the underlying framework."

However, what a "reasonable method" is, without the support of specifications, is debatable. For common products, such as drywall, it shouldn't be difficult to show that Gypsum Association standards and similar references would be reasonable. And while the same argument could be used for installation of ceramic tile, the contractor could reasonably argue that without specifications, the most basic of the many installation options available in Tile Council of North America are all that is required. Still, that's a great improvement over simply laying the tile on the floor!

The complementary clause is powerful, but there is no substitute for showing everything required both on the drawings and in the specifications.

About the Author

Sheldon Wolfe, RA, FCSI, CCS, CCCA, has been a specifier with BWBR in St. Paul, Minnesota, for more than 20 years, and an architect for nearly four decades. His experience includes 10 years in the public sector and work at firms ranging in size from two to 160; his projects have included medical, correctional, educational and wastewater treatment facilities. Wolfe has written more than 400 articles about construction-related subjects. His work appears on two blogs: swconstructivethoughts.blogspot.com and swspecificthoughts.blogspot.com.

ABOUT THE BLOGGER

Letsfixconstruction.com

Let's Fix Construction is written by a collective group of construction professionals involved in letsfixconstruction.com, an online impartial platform to provide forward-thinking solutions to many longstanding issues that have plagued construction. Organizers and contributors seek to better the industry by sharing knowledge, while creating open and positive communication and collaboration. Many of the posts have appeared first on letsfixconstruction.com and are republished on Durability + Design with permission. Author information is available at the bottom of each blog entry.

SEE ALL CONTENT FROM THIS CONTRIUBTOR

   

Tagged categories: Construction; Contractors; Specification; Specification writing; Specifiers

Comment from Charles Thompson, (3/5/2018, 12:32 PM)

The Indianapolis Chapter has been doing the same for the last 15 years. We have three hour classes each over five Saturdays and the last class is devoted to reading through the A201. It always impresses the attendees as to how much information is included and they are always surprised at how much of the CSI "way" is based on that document. Everyone in construction should know it or the General Conditions being used on every specific project.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
Novatek Corporation
 
Novatek Portable Air Filtration Systems
 
Air Scrubbers/Negative Air machines for restoration, abatement, dust & odor control, hazardous contaminant removal from job sites to clean rooms and hospitals. Portable, affordable!
 

 
Atlas Material Testing Technology
 
Helping You Put Your Products To The Test
 
  • Outdoor Accelerated Weathering
  • Laboratory Testing Services
  • Accelerated Weathering Instruments

  • www.atlas-mts.com
    atlas.info@ametek.com
 

 
EMME Controls
 
EMME (Energy Management Made Easy)
 
• Achieve a zone in every room for 1/2 the cost
• Save up to 40% in energy consumption
• Works in any size building
• Can be installed in as little as a few days without remodeling
• Comfort results guaranteed in writing
 

 
Keim Mineral Coatings
 
Mineral Silicate Paints + Stains Fuse to Concrete
 
• Forms permanent chemical bonds
• Becomes part of the concrete
• Will never peel
• Looks completely natural
 

 
Garland Company
 
Architectural Wall Coating Damproofs and Beautifies
 
Tuff-Coat™ multi-functional coating bridges hairline cracks, hides stains and discoloration, and reduces wall temperature, increasing the wall's life cycle.
 

 
Shield Industries, Inc
 
FireGuard® E-84 Intumescent Coating - Shield Industries, Inc
 
Trust the certified protection of the industry’s most innovative intumescent coating FireGuard® E-84 to provide you with the 1 and 2 hour fire ratings you need.
 

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved