Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 


Rules of Removal, Chemical Stripping and Historic Masonry

From D+D, May 2013



More items for Maintenance + Renovation

by Courtney Murdock, AMT Lab

The author explains the process for removing coatings from historic substrates, specifically masonry....
(Login to read the full article)

   

Tagged categories: Chemical stripping; Historic Structures; Lead; Masonry; Prosoco Inc.

Comment from Jon Cavallo, (7/5/2013, 8:58 AM)

I suggest that Ms. Murdock spend a little less time lecturing and a little more time attending state-of-the-art conferences to see what technologies are now available for surface cleaning involved in restoration of historic structures. For instance, lead and other heavy metals can be reliably detected using nondestructive instruments without disturbing the existing coating layer. Her photos in the article (particularly of the US Capitol project) demonstrate the environmental mess that can be created by combining chemical strippers with high-volume water cleaning. Additionally, please note the construction "white-hats" standing in close proximity to the water cleaning operation are most assuredly breathing in the paint-debris laden water mist produced by the water cleaning operation.


Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (9/3/2013, 11:12 AM)

Why not dry ice blasting? When I saw a demonstration on a historical bridge, it worked very well (certainly faster and cleaner than the chemical stripping) - with no damage to the underlying concrete. Of course, old mortar and brick is a lot softer than structural concrete. The chemical stripper photos shown above show a lot of debris and water just being released into the environment, without even tarps on the ground to try and catch debris for proper disposal. Also, are you being sure to test EVERY layer of EVERY paint for lead? It was not mentioned in the article. Just dabbing the topcoat is not sufficient to determine if lead is present in lower layers.


Comment from M. Halliwell, (9/4/2013, 11:02 AM)

A lot has changed in the last 15 years (since some of the used photos). Locally, neither of the rinse / water blasting projects in the photographs would have been permitted to proceed without containment for the debris and wash water as well as better protection for the observers (whatever their roles).


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Advertisements
 
Novatek Corporation
 
Novatek Portable Air Filtration Systems
 
Air Scrubbers/Negative Air machines for restoration, abatement, dust & odor control, hazardous contaminant removal from job sites to clean rooms and hospitals. Portable, affordable!
 

 
Shield Industries, Inc
 
FireGuard® E-84 Intumescent Coating - Shield Industries, Inc
 
Trust the certified protection of the industry’s most innovative intumescent coating FireGuard® E-84 to provide you with the 1 and 2 hour fire ratings you need.
 

 
Keim Mineral Coatings
 
Mineral Silicate Paints + Stains Fuse to Concrete
 
• Forms permanent chemical bonds
• Becomes part of the concrete
• Will never peel
• Looks completely natural
 

 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved