Durability + Design

Building Performance and Aesthetics

A Product of Technology Publishing
JPCL/PaintSquare | D+D | Paint BidTracker

Subscribe to D+D Magazine
Download Free eBook on Polishing Concrete

Paint and Coatings Industry News

Main News Page


GC Held Liable for Sub’s Lapses

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

More items for Good Technical Practice

Comment | More

A general contractor well acquainted with a subcontractor’s indifference to fall protection is being held responsible for just such a lapse spotted by a federal inspector.

The decision comes from an Administrative Law Judge of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, an independent agency that fields appeals to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The ruling upholds one serious violation and a penalty of $4,410 against Evergreen Construction Company of Atlanta, GA. The ruling by Judge Sharon D. Calhoun is awaiting final review by the entire commission.

'Fall Hazards on Every Corner'

The case stems from an OSHA inspection June 12, 2012, at a hotel construction site where Evergreen was the general contractor. The inspection was prompted by a complaint.

Hyatt Hotel
Evergreen Construction

One employee was hanging over the building edge, and another was standing on scaffolding without fall protection on the fourth floor of a six-story Hyatt House project.

Among the 20 subcontractors and 40 workers on site, the inspector saw several employees working about 30 feet up on the fourth floor, which was then the top floor. The employees worked for Nunez Construction, a subcontractor based in Austell, GA.

The floor was only partially built, with no walls and no guardrails or safety nets. Employees were working "from all edges," installing concrete masonry units (CMUs) to build the exterior walls, the inspector reported.

The inspector "observed fall hazards on every corner, on every side of the facility, and that there were no guardrails," the judge wrote.

The inspector saw no place to tie off where employees were working. He saw one employee standing unprotected on a fourth-floor scaffold and another leaning over the building edge.

'Didn't I Tell You?'

The OSHA compliance officer tracked down Evergreen's onsite construction supervisor, who also functioned as safety manager and superintendent.

Together, the two went to talk to the Nunez owner, identified in court documents only as "Mr. Nunez."

"Didn't I tell you to get some fall protection on?" the superintendent said to Nunez.

Scaffolding
OSHA

Guardrail systems must be installed along all open sides and ends of platforms, and must be in place before the scaffold is released for use by employees.

Nunez employees told the OSHA inspector that they had been working on the fourth floor for three days without fall protection.

Nunez was fined $10,780 for two citations for serious violations, which it is contesting. (The company was also cited by OSHA in 2011 and 2009.)

Evergreen was also fined as the controlling employer on the jobsite.

What the GC Knew

To prove a violation in such cases, OSHA must show that the controlling employer "knew or could have known with the exercise of reasonable diligence of the violative condition."

In this case, the GC superintendent successfully argued that he had no "actual" knowledge of the violation, because he did not see the Nunez workers outside the trailer window where he had been that morning.

On the other hand, both the superintendent and Evergreen's project manager testified at hearings on the case that "they knew Nunez Construction did not use fall protection prior to the date of the inspection," Calhoun wrote.

In fact, the superintendent testified, he had previously warned Nunez employees about not using fall protection; had taken them off the job until they acquired it; had sent them home for not using it; and sometimes had even provided it for them.

'Not Very Reliable'

He said he had seen safety violations by Nunez on several occasions, including "people not even dressed properly, not wearing the proper safety equipment, such as hard hats, work boots, not only safety harnesses and lanyards and tie-offs."

Evergreen Construction
Evergreen Construction

The judge commended Evergreen's safety program and training with its own employees but said it had not shown similar diligence with the subcontractor.

"Although Nunez Construction had been on the jobsite only a few weeks, its reputation for not wearing fall protection was well known by" the Evergreen superintendent, the judge wrote.

"Further," the superintendent "testified they were not very reliable regarding 'man power, safety, showing up to the job at the proper time; pretty much everything in general.'"

The judge also noted that the Nunez employees had been working for two or three hours on the morning of the inspection and that the violative conditions "were in plain view."

While commending Evergreen's safety program and training, the judge said the general contractor could have foreseen the fall-protection violations "with the exercise of reasonable diligence."

   

Tagged categories: Fall protection; General contractors; Health and safety; OSHA; Regulations; Subcontractors

Comment from peter gibson, (8/20/2014, 12:54 PM)

Nunez was the ultra low bidder on this job...so there you be.


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

Arroworthy
ArroWorthy's Handcrafted Professional Brushes

One Dip of paint with our handcrafted semi-oval Rembrandt brush, you'll see why ArroWorthy makes a professional brush of unrivaled quality and performance.


KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA Inspection Services

Determine Specification Compliance:
• Surface Preparation
• Moisture Content
• Paint Materials & Application
• Aesthetics
Contact:
Kevin Brown, 336-874-2651
Corporate:
1-800-245-6379 x208


Chemique Inc.
Paint Removal Made Easy!

Remove multiple coats in one application. Easy to use and safe. All products meet or exceed V.O.C. regulations. Contain no methylene chloride, methanol or petroleum distillates.


Shield Industries, Inc
FireGuard® E-84 Intumescent Coating - Shield Industries, Inc

Trust the certified protection of the industry’s most innovative intumescent coating FireGuard® E-84 to provide you with the 1 and 2 hour fire ratings you need.


L. M. Scofield
Scofield High-Performance Concrete Floors

Scofield's Formula One Polished Concrete System is the next step in the evolution of architectural concrete: durable, low-maintenance and sustainable.


SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
http://www.sspc.org/

Join SSPC and Enhance
Your Career !


DuPont Building Innovations
DuPont™ Tyvek® Fluid Applied WB System

The DuPont™ Tyvek® Fluid Applied System was put to the test at the new Texas A&M Liberal Arts and Humanities building Click to see the results.

 
 
 
Technology Publishing

The Technology Publishing Network

The Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings (JPCL) PaintSquare
Durability + Design Paint BidTracker JPCL Europe

 
EXPLORE D+D:      Interact   |   Blogs   |   Resources   |   Buying Guides   |   Webinars   |   White Papers   |   Classifieds
GET D+D:      Subscribe   |   Advertising Media Kit
KNOW D+D:      About D+D   |   Privacy policy   |   Terms & conditions   |   Site Map   |   Search   |   Contact Us
 

© Copyright 2010-2014, Technology Publishing, Co., All rights reserved
2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951; Tel 1-412-431-8300; Fax 1-412-431-5428; E-mail webmaster@paintsquare.com