Durability + Design
 
About  |  Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Connect 
Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook

 

Download our FREE e-book! Advances in Architectural Coatings Technology

D+D News

Main News Page


Architects Call for Design-Build Reform

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

More items for Good Technical Practice

Comment | More

U.S. architects are calling on lawmakers to reform the federal government’s design-build contracting process.

Current rules cost design and construction firms more than $260,000, on average, to compete for a federal design-build project, according to a recent survey published by the American Institute of Architects.

The federal contracting laws are thereby “discouraging talented architects from competing for federal contracts, depriving government and, by inference, taxpayers of the best design expertise available,” according to the AIA’s testimony Dec. 3 before the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform .

United States Army Corps of Engineers Private First Class (PFC) Eric P. Woods Soldier Family Care Center
Leo A Daly

The costs of the federal design-build contracting process has deterred many firms from participating in those contracts, AIA says. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Private First Class Eric P. Woods Soldier Family Care Center in Fort Carson, CO, is a government design-build project completed by architecture firm Leo A Daly.

The organization's representative urged Congress to pass a bill meant to streamline the process.

Testifying for Reform

Charles Dalluge, executive vice president of Omaha, NE-based architecture firm Leo A Daly, called on the committee to reform the process so that more design firms can bid on contracts without the fear of losing hundreds of thousands of dollars in the process.

“Due to the current economic climate, design firms face the dilemma of ‘betting it all’ on a contract they may not get, or self-selecting out of the federal design-build market,” Dalluge said. It also costs taxpayers more money “when contracting officers spend increasing amounts of time reviewing a larger number of complicated design proposals,” he added.

He noted that the federal market has been a key to architecture firms’ survival during the recession, and increased competition costs have forced many firms from participating in federal contracts.

Dalluge
Leo A Daly

Charles Dalluge, executive vice president of Omaha, NE-based architecture firm Leo A Daly, testified before lawmakers Dec. 3.

“According to a survey published by the AIA Large Firm Roundtable in 2012, between 2007 and 2011 architecture firms in teams that competed for public- and private-sector design-build projects spent a median of $260,000, by making detailed plans, models and other materials,” Dalluge said.

Moreover, in recent years, federal agencies have forced larger numbers of teams to compete against one another, reducing the chances that any one team can win, according to the testimony.

Design-Build Efficiency and Jobs Act

Dalluge specifically called on Congress to pass “The Design-Build Efficiency and Jobs Act of 2013” (H.R. 2750), which was introduced by Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO) in July.

Sam Graves
graves.house.gov

Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO) introduced “The Design-Build Efficiency and Jobs Act of 2013” in July. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

“H.R. 2750 requires contracting officers to provide a written justification to the head of an agency for requiring more than five finalists in the second stage of a design-build solicitation and agency approval of such justification,” Dalluge said.

The legislation “will provide more certainty and opportunities for design firms of all sizes who wish to enter the federal marketplace,” he said.

In addition, the act will also limit federal agencies’ burdens in reviewing a large number of proposals.

Design-build reform has been a major legislative priority for the AIA.

   

Tagged categories: American Institute of Architects (AIA); Architecture; Building design; Designers; Laws and litigation

Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

KTA-Tator, Inc. - Corporate Office
KTA Laboratory Services

Fully equipped lab to solve
the most challenging
coatings problems.
Contact:
Kevin Brown, 336-874-2651
Corporate:
1-800-245-6379 x208


Chicago Corrosion Group
Vendor-neutral corrosion consulting

When reliability is paramount.
For more information,
call 877-516-9514


Dumond Chemicals Inc.
Peel Away®1 Heavy Duty Paint Remover

has been the #1 Choice of Professionals who perform Historic Restoration and Lead Paint Abatement for over 25 years. Peel Away®1 is an eco-safe method for removing up to 30 Coats of oil-based lead paints in a single application.


Keim Mineral Coatings
Translucent concrete stains for new and old concrete

Penetrating, translucent mineral silicate stains harmonize uneven concrete color and blend patches and repairs, without the "painted" look. Will never peel.


PPG Protective and Marine Coatings Group
Industrial strength performance in ONE can.

Now get the durability and protection of two components in one can: Amercoat® ONE, PSX® ONE and Sigmadur ONE.


AGC Chemicals
Reflective FEVE Resin Panels Help Create Fish-Scale Effect in Olympic Village

LUMIFLON based coatings can last up to 30 years without fading, offering a low-maintenance solution that retains color and gloss and can be field-applied.


Atlas Material Testing Technology

Helping You Put Your Products To The Test

• Outdoor Accelerated
Weathering
• Laboratory Testing
Services
• Accelerated Weathering
Instruments

www.atlas-mts.com atlas.info@ametek.com


Hanley Wood Exhibitions

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 310, Pittsburgh PA 15203-1951

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2015, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved